Finite Ring Cosmology

Theoretical framework for reinterpretation of Mathematics, Physics and Cosmology over a finite holographic substrate whose cardinality is fixed by the de Sitter entropy. One succession of arguments from first principles to finite arithmetic, open problems of mathematics, and the physics of the Standard Model. Every claim tagged, sourced, formalised and, where it admits a finite check, machine-verified.

The predicate ledger of the corpus: the master ledger 00 and the ledger of every public paper, one predicate per row. A row is cited by its ledger and label, as 00:A1 or 35:P11, and each label opens the row in its own ledger. The accession key pNNNNN stays fixed while labels may move, and register.html#pNNNNN opens its row. The Filters choose a paper, a block and a status, and the search runs within the choice. Across all papers, a prediction or an explanation stated in more than one paper is listed once, at its first appearance, with its restatements linked.

Filters
#PredictionStatus Sources
00. The master ledger
00:P1p00133The running floor: the shape a₀(z) ∝ H(z)The acceleration floor tracks the drive rate, $a_0(z)\propto H(z)$: a relation, $\Om$-blind, derived from L1 under the gravity realisation (D5); the knee shifts and the Tully–Fisher zero-point evolves as $E(z)^{1/4}$. Falsifier: a floor constant in redshift, or tracking other than $H(z)$. Confrontation (43-muse): MUSE-DARK III excludes a constant floor to $z=1.3$; RC100 implies the local floor by $z\simeq2$, pending refit.T
restated: 14:P1, 21:P5, 32:P1
00:P2p00061The coherent-fraction channelEqual force, unequal entanglement (D5): sources gravitate by full masses; synchronised cross-source pairs carry the conditional phase $f_1f_2\varphi_N$, spread pairs imprint which-branch data, the incoherent channel separable at generic geometry ($C=0$ at $f=0$); $f=m_c/m$ microscopic. The discriminator is the calibrated conditional phase rate at fixed centre-of-mass superposition. Falsifier: a calibrated conditional phase rate off $f_1f_2\varphi_N$. Confrontation: none, filed before data.T
00:P3p00180Flavour (targets): the Georgi–Jarlskog double ratio $9$; the locks of G17 read in the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ scheme; the $m_1{=}0$ floor, $\sum m_\nu=58.8$ meV at NuFIT 6.0, on the boundary-branch realisation (28:B6). Falsifier: inverted ordering, a degenerate spectrum, or $\sum m_\nu$ off $58.8$ meV beyond the fit’s tolerance. Confrontation: the data give $10.4\pm0.5$, an open $15\%$ tension (28:X5).T
00:P4p00091Exclusion predictionsNo fourth generation, no fifth force, an empty desert, no TeV supersymmetry, no new dark-matter particle, no beyond-SM $(g{-}2)_\mu$, and the proton effectively stable ($\tau_p\gtrsim10^{45}$ yr; G9). Entailed by the closed ladder of the rank-five frame ($\dim\Lambda^{\mathrm{even}}=16$, D6), given the role-to-matter realisation (27:B6, 27:C10) and completeness (A3). Falsifier: any excluded object observed. Confrontation: none observed.T
10-dim. Dimensional Analysis over Finite Holographic Substrate
10:P1p10053The resolution floor, staked: no single coherent registration resolves finer than $\Om^{-1/4}$, of the order of $10^{-31}$, and no coherent count exceeds $\Om^{1/4}\approx6\times10^{30}$ (G5 over A2, A5, B1; the holographic reading of Rem. 1). Falsifier: one coherent registration finer than that. Confrontation: the finest interspecies frequency ratio, $3.2\times10^{-18}$ [Aeppli & others 2025], and the finest differential comparison, $7.6\times10^{-21}$ [Bothwell et al. 2022] — $67$ bits against $102$, averaged determinations; the mass-independent clock bound $(t_P^{2}t)^{1/3}$ permits finer beyond $730$ s.T
python sourceLean, the core
Rem. 16, § 9
10:P2p10054Constancy, staked: every dimensionless ratio of the constants is fixed in time and position, zero drift, zero dipole — the totality timeless (B1), every constant a residue of it in the framework’s realisation (A1; the quartet’s, E1, E6; the charge’s, Rem. 21), the quartet’s fixed by the congruences given $\dS$ (E4), selected once (E7). Falsifier: a detected variation (E1’s). Confrontation: $\dot\alpha/\alpha=1.8(2.5)\times10^{-19}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ [Filzinger et al. 2023], consistent with zero.T
python sourceLean, the core
§ 6.1, § 9; rests on F5
14-entr. De Sitter Entropy Estimates over Finite Holographic Substrate
14:P2p14037The registered record depth is bounded by $(\pi/4)\,r_H/c=13.79$ Gyr [approx] (channel-1 anchor) at every observational frame chronon, against a $\Lambda$CDM $t_0$ that grows with chart time: degenerate to $0.2\%$ now, separating at ${\sim}7\%$ per Gyr; the octant carries zero parameter freedom at fixed $\Lambda$. Status [Valcin et al. 2026]: the oldest cluster population $0.5\sigma$ below the bound, the inferred age straddling it within $0.1\sigma$ (§ 3.5). Falsifier: one well-dated object older than the octant value, in any frame — fit-independent, fatal; the same bound excludes interior-bounce black-hole cosmology (X8).T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
Lem. 1; rests on A8, B3, C5
master: 00:L3
14:P3p14038The age–rate locus $t_{\mathrm{age}}H_0=(\pi/4)/\tanh(3\pi/8)=0.950$, exact for the realisation set. Read on the fit-independent stellar age ($13.61\pm0.34$ Gyr): $H_0=68.2\pm1.7$ km/s/Mpc [approx], $0.5\sigma$ from Planck, $0.65\sigma$ from TRGB, $2.4\sigma$ from the Cepheid ladder — the framework favours the CMB/TRGB value at that significance, and forbids the $\Omega_\Lambda\approx0.76$ by which the rival chart would accommodate the ladder value at the same age. Read on the channel-1 $\Lambda$ it returns the channel-1 $H_0$ (to $0.1\%$): a consistency, not a prediction (C8). Falsifier: a confirmed ladder $H_0$ with the stellar age standing ($t_\star H_0\ge1.0$ against $0.950$).T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
§ 3.5; rests on A8, B3, C5, C7
master: 00:L3
14:P4p14039(Lead.) The dark-energy equation of state is rigid: $\Lambda$ is the curvature face of the fixed cardinality, constant, its effective-fluid reading $w=-1$ exactly with no $w_0w_a$ freedom; the fluid statement consumes the conservation-law correspondence and the single-component clause (B8). Status: DESI-era combined fits prefer evolving dark energy at $3$–$4.2\sigma$ [DESI Collaboration 2025], contested by reanalyses (§ 3). Falsifier: confirmed evolution of $w$, which kills $\Lambda\sim1/\Om$ outright and exposes P2 through $\Lambda$.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
§ 3; rests on A1, A8, B1
master: 00:L3
21-grav. Gravitation as Phase Synchronisation
21:P1p21049Strong-field signatures at or outside the photon sphere: shadow $+4.6\%$, eikonal ringdown $-4.4\%$ (the $(2,2,0)$ reading open, GW250114 the exposure; master E13, E14), ISCO frequency $-6.9\%$ with accretion efficiency $5.48\%$ (against $5.72\%$): one origin, jointly falsifiable, conditional on Theorem 6.5's inputs alone.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
§ 7.1, Prop. 7.1, 7.2; rests on B2, C11, C12, 00:E4
master: 00:E14
21:P2p21051Preferred-frame effects at $O(1/\sqrt\Omega)=O(10^{-62})$ ($3\times10^{-62}$ at $\Omega=1.3\times10^{123}$): the drive’s in-principle signature, far below current $10^{-5}$ bounds.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
Prop. 5.11; rests on A1, C10, 00:E5
21:P3p21052The weak-acceleration floor $a_0=cH_0/2\pi=1.04\times10^{-10}\,\mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}$ at the entailed $H_0=67.4$ [Akhtman & Voether 2026], against the fitted $1.20\pm0.24\times10^{-10}$: $13\%$ low, $0.7\sigma$ of the systematic-dominated error, no free parameter; the $2\pi$ the dictionary’s full cycle (14:B2), the one-cycle-per-period threshold the realisation 32:B3 with its discrete falsifier.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
Prop. 7.4; rests on A8, C16, 14:C8, 00:L1
master: 00:L1
restated: 38:P1
21:P4p21053The radial acceleration relation, $g_{\mathrm{obs}}=g_N/(1-e^{-\sqrt{g_N/a_0}})$, no fitted function beyond the barrier identification (B9), the form the data selected across the four observed acceleration decades, its approach to Newton the discriminant ($0.05$ at $g_N\approx5a_0$ against the simple rational interpolant); the deep limit gives the baryonic Tully–Fisher relation $v^4=GMa_0$.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
Prop. 7.7; rests on A8, C16, C19
21:P6p21055The 2PN periastron excess $\delta\dot\omega/\dot\omega\approx1.5\times10^{-6}$ for PSR J0737$-$3039, today degenerate with the mass refit; decisive either way once an independent observable fixes $M_{\mathrm{tot}}$ at $10^{-6}$. Independent of the coherent-fraction falsifier of [Akhtman & Voether 2026]; the ledger carries both.T
python sourceLean, the coreLean, Mathlib
§ 7.2; rests on A8, C8, C23
21:P7p21050Floor-surface signatures: no prompt echoes (the exact profile horizonless with no reflecting surface, C12; the round-trip delay to $r_f$ carrying $e^{2u(r_f)}=\Omega$) and no evaporation bursts; a reported echo detection at the stated precision falsifies the construction.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
§ 7.1, Rem. 6.7, 6.9; rests on C13, 00:E5
21:P8p21060The primordial tilt $n_s-1=-\pi^{2}/\ln\Omega=-0.0348$ [approx] at $\ln\Omega=283.5$ (the master’s scale import), against Planck 2018 $-0.0351\pm0.0042$ ($+0.07\sigma$); $0.24\%$ per factor two in $S$; the neighbouring count $\tfrac12\ln\Omega$ excluded at $8.2\sigma$.T
python sourceLean, Mathlib
Prop. 7.8; rests on A8, C18, 00:L8
master: 00:L8
22-qm. Quantum Observation over Finite Substrate
22:P1p22052Gravitationally induced entanglement at exactly the Newtonian rate [chart], $V^2+C^2=1$ on the pure channel: equal force but unequal entanglement — a source gravitates by its full mass while the systematic conditional phase, the calibrated discriminator, is carried by the coherent sectors alone, the fully incoherent channel separable at generic (nondegenerate) geometry. The one dated forward prediction.T
python sourceLean, the coreLean, Mathlib
Rem. 9.2; rests on A4, B8, C19, C21
22:P2p22053Third-order interference exactly zero at every accessible scale, any wrap quantised to a multiple of $\Omega$: a single confirmed small $I_3\neq0$ falsifies outright.T
python sourceLean, the coreLean, Mathlib
Cor. 5.4, Rem. 5.12; rests on B1, C8
22:P3p22054The Tsirelson value $S=2\sqrt2$ exact [chart] and the network behaviour of complex (not real) quantum theory: vacuum dispersion, $S\neq2\sqrt2$, or non-quantum network behaviour each falsify.T
python sourceLean, the coreLean, Mathlib
Thm. 7.11, 7.15; rests on B2, B5, C17, C18
22:P4p22055No vacuum dispersion at any sub-horizon order (the finite double cover accumulates nothing): the gamma-ray-burst time-of-flight bounds leave the framework untouched.T
python sourceLean, the core
Rem. 3.7; rests on A2, B2
master: 00:C20
22:P5p22056Quantum computation succeeds as standard quantum mechanics prescribes at every accessible depth; the first deviation, if any, is quantised at the unit-core ceiling $k^*=408$ ($204$ for $\sqrt\Omega$) [chart], not gradual.T
python sourceLean, the coreLean, Mathlib
Prop. 5.19; rests on A5, C14
27-fld. Standard-Model Interactions over Finite Substrate
27:P1p27035No fourth generation and no fifth interaction [forced]. The role ladder closes, the fifth step returns to counting, and the Carrier is the entire substrate, so a fourth chiral family and a fifth fundamental force are forbidden, not merely absent (Tier 4). Falsifier: any fourth-generation fermion, or any new fundamental interaction.T
Prop. 8.7; fld.p9b; rests on A1, B6, C10, 00:A3
master: 00:P4
27:P2p27036A desert to the substrate scale [forced]. The gauge group is exactly $\SU(3)\times\SU(2)\times\U(1)$ until the substrate resolves the colour–isospin split; no new gauge boson, vector-like fermion, or extra scalar lies between the electroweak and substrate ($\sim10^{16}$–$10^{19}\,$GeV) scales. Falsifier: a $Z'$, $W'$, leptoquark, second Higgs doublet, or compositeness signature at the LHC or a future collider. This is the sharpest divergence from supersymmetry, extra dimensions, and composite-Higgs scenarios.T
Prop. 8.2; rests on B1, B5, C9
master: 00:P4
27:P3p27037No TeV supersymmetry [forced]. The ${\sim}13\%$ three-coupling near-miss is closed by the $X,Y$ completion at the substrate scale, with the running carried by purely Standard-Model content; there are no superpartners enforcing exact low-scale unification. Falsifier: discovery of superpartners, or evidence that unification demands TeV-scale thresholds.T
Prop. 8.3; fld.p1; rests on A3, A6, C9
master: 00:P4
27:P4p27038The proton is effectively stable, $\tau_p\gtrsim10^{45}\,$yr [forced]. The $X,Y$ leptoquarks acquire mass at the substrate scale, not at $\sim10^{16}\,$GeV, so $\tau_p\sim M_X^4/(\al_{\mathrm{GUT}}^2 m_p^5)$ reaches $10^{45}$–$10^{47}\,$yr for $M_X$ near the Planck scale, orders beyond the $\sim10^{36}\,$yr of supersymmetric $\SO(10)$ and the $\sim10^{35}\,$yr reach of Hyper-Kamiokande. Falsifier: observation of $p\to e^+\pi^0$ near $10^{34}$–$10^{35}\,$yr in Hyper-Kamiokande, DUNE, or JUNO, against the current bound [superk2017]. The programme predicts these searches find nothing.T
Prop. 8.2; fld.p8; rests on A3, A6, C9
master: 00:P4
restated: 35:P4
27:P5p27039Majorana neutrinos, heavy singlets, no light sterile neutrino [sector]. The $\nu^c$ is the gauge-singlet $\Lam^0$ of the generation, so it takes a Majorana mass at unification and drives the seesaw, the three right-handed states sitting at $\sim10^{14}$–$10^{15}\,$GeV. Falsifier: a confirmed eV-scale sterile neutrino, or evidence that the light neutrinos are Dirac. This diverges from Dirac-neutrino and sterile-neutrino interpretations and is consistent with $N_{\mathrm{eff}}=3$.T
Thm. 8.1, Prop. 8.4; fld.p7; rests on A4, B5, C8
27:P6p27040No new particle of dark matter [sector]. The matter content is exactly one Standard-Model generation, triplicated, with heavy $\nu^c$; the construction contains no weakly-interacting massive particle and no axion. Falsifier: a positive signal in a direct-detection (LZ, XENONnT) or axion (ADMX) experiment. Dark matter, if not a Standard-Model state, must then reside in the gravitational/substrate sector, a residual burden of the programme.T
Thm. 8.1; rests on B5, B6, C8, C10
master: 00:P4
27:P7p27041No new-physics contribution to the muon anomaly [sector]. With no states beyond the Standard Model, $(g-2)_\mu$ must be accounted for by Standard-Model (notably hadronic) contributions. Falsifier: a robustly established beyond-Standard-Model excess; the current lattice and experimental trend toward the Standard-Model value favours this prediction.T
Thm. 8.1; rests on C8, C10
master: 00:P4
27:P8p27042The charged-lepton Koide relation is exactly $2/3$ [structural]: $(m_e+m_\mu+m_\tau)/(\sqrt{m_e}+\sqrt{m_\mu}+\sqrt{m_\tau})^2=2/3$, empirically to one part in $10^{5}$, is the cube-root generation orbit at the self-dual value $\rho^2=2^{-1}$ — $Q=\tfrac13+\tfrac23\rho^2$ exact, $\rho^2$ the quarter-turn ($4\mid\Omega-1$) self-dual amplitude on the cubic ($3\mid\Omega+1$) plane. Form and value derived; the selection of the mass vector onto that orientation is the $\Omega$-hard flavour residual (28:Z1). Falsifier: a measured $Q$ displaced from $2/3$ beyond the per-mille winding-phase corrections.T
Prop. 8.8; fld.koide; rests on B5, C11, 00:G16
master: 00:G16
restated: 28:P1
27:P9p27043Vanishing strong-CP angle without an axion [structural]. The QCD vacuum angle vanishes on the substrate, $\bar\theta=0$ with no axion: the colour action carries no topological term and colour is drive-invariant, so the bare $\theta=0$, and the Hermitian quark mass matrices have real determinant, so $\arg\det M_q=0$, while the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa phase sits in the up–down misalignment. Falsifier: a neutron electric dipole moment above the QCD floor, or a discovered axion.T
Prop. 8.9; fld.strongcp; rests on A6, B4, C7
master: 00:G7
28-flav. Fermion Flavour Sector over Finite Substrate
28:P2p28037Up-quark Koide $Q_u=5/6$ in framed arithmetic, $r_u^2=N(1-\omega)=3$; continuum $0.849$ in the working scheme, $0.832$ with pole masses, band $0.83$–$0.89$. Falsifier: up/charm/top masses moving $Q_u$ outside the band in every standard scheme.T
master: 00:G17
28:P3p28038Cabibbo $V_{us}=|\sqrt{m_d/m_s}-e^{i\varphi}\sqrt{m_u/m_c}|$: leading term $0.224^{+0.011}_{-0.004}$ vs $0.2243$ ($0.3\%$), the up term $\pm0.04$ with $\varphi$ open. Falsifier: no $\varphi$ satisfying the relation within the input band.T
C6; rests on B3
28:P5p28039Normal neutrino ordering, from $Q_\nu=2/3$, the two $\Delta m^2$ and the boundary branch (B6); the signed circulant solves both orderings (C11b). Falsifier: inverted ordering.T
§ 5; flv.neutrino; rests on A6, B5, C11
28:P6p28040Mass-sum floor $\sum m_\nu=58.7$ meV ($m_1{\simeq}0$, $m_2{\simeq}8.6$, $m_3{\simeq}50$ meV; $58.8$ at NuFIT 6.0), the $m_1=0$ normal-ordering floor. Falsifier: a cosmological $\sum m_\nu<0.058$ eV.T
§ 5; flv.neutrino; rests on A6, B5, B6, C11, Y1
master: 00:P3
28:P7p28041Effective Majorana mass $m_{\beta\beta}{\simeq}1.5$–$3.7$ meV (NO, $m_1{\simeq}0$, circulant phase). Falsifier: a $0\nu\beta\beta$ signal at the inverted scale $15$–$50$ meV.T
C11; rests on B6, Y1
28:P8p28042Leptonic CP locked to the octant by (8): $\delta_{\mathrm{CP}}\in(204^\circ,310^\circ)$ over the $3\sigma$ $\theta_{23}$ range, $\pm124^\circ$/$\pm74^\circ$ at the NuFIT 6.0 best fits, $\sin\delta_{\mathrm{CP}}{<}0$, $J=1/(6\sqrt3)$. Falsifier: CP-conserving $\delta_{\mathrm{CP}}$, $\sin\delta_{\mathrm{CP}}{>}0$, or $(\theta_{23},\delta_{\mathrm{CP}})$ off the relation.T
32-dark. The Dark Sector over Finite Substrate
32:P2p32039The scatter is the two-variable form $\sigma=(2\tan\alpha/\ln10)\,\delta\alpha$, vanishing for cold high-$x$ systems and rising as $x^{-1/4}$; SPARC at fixed $\az$: intrinsic $0.038$ dex overall, $0.04$ at the knee, $0.13$ at $x\simeq0.02$, bounding $\delta\alpha\lesssim3.5^{\circ}$. Falsifier: a deep-regime intrinsic scatter that does not rise, or a measured collective spread the scatter does not track.T
§ 5.1, § 8.2; dark.rar_scatter, dark.predictions; rests on B5, C8
32:P3p32040Wide binaries ($\gtrsim10$ kAU) follow $\gb/(1-e^{-\sqrt{x}})$ with the global $\az$ and the vector Galactic field $\gext\simeq1.8\az$: a $10$–$30\%$ velocity enhancement ($12$–$16\%$ at $10$–$40$ kAU on the collinear estimate), the exponential knee distinct from Newtonian and rational forms. Falsifier: Newtonian wide-binary motion, or a knee of the wrong shape.T
§ 8.2; dark.predictions; rests on B4, B8, C6, C9
32:P4p32041Pressure-supported systems (ellipticals, dSphs, UDGs) lie below the cold-disk relation by the coherence factor $\sqrt{w}$, $w=1/(1+(\sigma_v/v)^{2})$, by $0.05$–$0.15$ dex for $\sigma_v/v=0.5$–$1$, correlating with $\sigma_v/v$. Falsifier: pressure-supported systems on the cold-disk relation.T
§ 8.2; dark.predictions; rests on B4, B6, C10
32:P5p32042Coherence-state cluster gas: the X-ray gas gravitates only when bulk-coherent, contributing in a relaxed cluster ($C_{ij}\to1$) and dropping out of a merger ($C_{ij}\to0$), the lensing displacement growing with the shock Mach number; the quantitative core residual of the same law is the conjecture Y1. Falsifier: a merger lensing peak tracking the shocked gas, or no relaxed-versus-merging difference.T
Eq. (12), § 8.2; rests on B6, C10
32:P6p32043A global, isotropic scale and no dark substructure: the floor is the global drive rate, identical in every direction and environment once the external-field correction is made; no new dark-matter state and no dark subhaloes, so stream perturbations and the satellite abundance trace baryons alone. Falsifier: a directional or density dependence of $\az$ beyond the external-field effect, or stream gaps and substructure lensing with no baryonic counterpart.T
B1, B3; § 8.2; rests on C9
master: 00:P4
35-hadr. Ground-State Light Hadron Spectroscopy over Finite Substrate
35:P1p35051Gell-Mann–Okubo exact at leading order; PDG $0.57\%$, the bounded $\chi_3^2$ second order. Falsifier: a violation beyond the second-order insertion.T
35:P2p35052Decuplet equal spacing exact; PDG $9.2\%$ spread, $\beta\simeq146.8$ MeV, the same second order. Falsifier: a non-equal spacing beyond it.T
35:P3p35053The hyperfine pattern $g_{\mathrm{spin}}=\half S(S+1)-\tfrac98$, octet $-\tfrac34$, decuplet $+\tfrac34$, separation $\tfrac32A_{\mathrm{light}}$ with $A_{\mathrm{light}}\simeq195$ MeV. Falsifier: a spin splitting outside this pattern.T
35:P5p35055No exotic light multiplets beyond the $\mathbf 8$ and $\mathbf{10}$ at leading wrap order. Falsifier: a confirmed light baryon outside the $\mathbf 8$ and $\mathbf{10}$ at the wrap scale.T
C1; rests on B1, B2
35:P6p35056Coleman–Glashow exact at one body; PDG $0.79\%$, the residual the two-body electromagnetic term; the orderings $M_n>M_p$ and $M_\Sigma>M_\Lambda$ fixed. Falsifier: a Coleman–Glashow violation beyond the two-body term.T
35:P7p35057Heavy-quark symmetry $M_{\Lambda_b}-M_{\Lambda_c}=M_B-M_D$ ($2.4\%$) and the $1/m_Q$ hyperfine ratio $(M_{\Sigma_c^{*}}-M_{\Sigma_c})/(M_{\Sigma^{*}}-M_{\Sigma})\simeq m_s/m_c$. Falsifier: a heavy-baryon spectrum off the spin-decoupled, $1/m_Q$-scaled pattern.T
35:P8p35058Second-order decuplet relation (7), the vanishing third difference; PDG $6$ MeV ($0.36\%$). Falsifier: a third difference beyond the few-MeV third-order scale.T
35:P9p35059Vector-meson nonet equal spacing $2M_{K^{*}}=M_\rho+M_\phi$ (PDG $0.42\%$) and ideal mixing $M_\omega\simeq M_\rho$; $\rho,\phi$ anchor, $K^{*},\omega$ predicted $<1\%$; the pseudoscalars are Goldstone bosons (a distinct chiral mechanism). Falsifier: a vector nonet off the linear-strangeness pattern.T
Prop. 15; had.vector_nonet; rests on B4, C18
35:P10p35060Absolute octet$+$decuplet spectrum from the $\Om$-hard scale $\sig$ and three sub-horizon eigenvalues ($\lambda_l$, $m_s/m_l$, $\lambda_{\mathrm{hf}}$, the two constituent ratios computed forward, C19): five parameter-free predictions within $1.1\%$ (Table A3) and three sub-horizon eigenvalues ($ _l=m_l/ $, $m_s/m_l$, $ _{ {hf (tab:absolute), p. 10">2). Falsifier: a predicted mass off beyond the traced second order.T
§ 3.9; had.absolute_masses; rests on A3, B2, C16, C17, Z1
35:P11p35061The $\Lambda$–$N$ gap is the strange constituent excess, $M_\Lambda-M_N=m_s-m_l=176.8$ MeV, hyperfine- and scale-free (10). Falsifier: a gap inconsistent with the strange seed and the $\Xi,\Sigma$ splittings.T

Status

T
Prediction. A theorem of its paper, or of the master, that names the realisations it consumes, stated with its falsifier and its present confrontation; a refuted confrontation fires the falsifier of the realisation it consumes, and a prediction that consumes none sends its derivation back for re-examination.

Sources

python sourceLean, the coreLean, Mathlib
The witnesses. Gold: the python check that decides the predicate, at its line in the script. Green: the predicate as one Lean declaration in the core, named by its accession key, proved with no axioms. Violet: the same on Mathlib. Red: a check that fails or a proof the gate rejects.
section
The statement in its paper that carries the prediction; for a master predicate, the papers that state it.
rests on
The predicates it rests on, by label.
master
The master-ledger predicates that carry the prediction.
restated
Later papers stating the same prediction, listed here once, at its first appearance.